holding that two grantees claiming under the after-acquired-title doctrine pursuant to conveyances before the grantor was vested in legal title took priority according to first in time principle where equities were equal
How later courts described this case
- holding that two grantees claiming under the after-acquired-title doctrine pursuant to conveyances before the grantor was vested in legal title took priority according to first in time principle where equities were equal
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
OPALA, Justice,
concurring.
Because the priority, if any, which may be asserted by Hamrick’s mortgagee over the revested Holleman and Epperly interest is not drawn in controversy nor decided by this appeal, I concur in the Court’s opinion and in its judgment.