Opinion

People v. Howard

  • 16 Cal. 4th 1081
  • 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 870
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 14473
  • 946 P.2d 828
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8952
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 1, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Mosk
On the bench
Chin, Mosk
Cited by
218 cases

noting that court has full sentencing discretion upon revocation of probation in such circumstances

How later courts described this case

  • noting that court has full sentencing discretion upon revocation of probation in such circumstances

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MOSK, J., Concurring.

The majority opinion accurately interprets existing statutes on the subject of sentencing and resentencing. Thus I fully concur.

However, I do have reservations on the strict limitation imposed on trial courts in the sentencing area. Sentences are imposed at the conclusion of trial proceedings or acceptance of a guilty plea. It is not inconceivable that the trial court, upon later reflection and in what it may subsequently deem to be the interests of justice, prefers a somewhat different sentence.

My confidence in the sentencing ability of trial courts suggests that their discretion should not be rigidly impaired by what appears to be a rather technical statutory limitation based entirely on the original sentence pronounced.

I mention this only to indicate a hope that the Legislature may consider expanding the statutory sentencing function of trial courts in this area.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.