Opinion

Worchester v. State

  • 536 P.2d 995
  • 1975 OK CR 111
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Jun 4, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Brett
On the bench
Bliss, Bussey, Brett
Cited by
13 cases

finding a "technical violation" of section 894 by written communication was harmless error

How later courts described this case

  • finding a "technical violation" of section 894 by written communication was harmless error
  • although trial court's failure to call jury into open court constituted a technical violation of section 894, any error was harmless

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BRETT, Presiding Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) •:

I concur that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction, but I dissent to the use of the sixteen year old convictions to enhance punishment. Therefore, I would modify the sentence imposed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.