Opinion

People v. Lewis

  • 88 Ill. 2d 129
  • 58 Ill. Dec. 895
  • 430 N.E.2d 1346
  • 1981 Ill. LEXIS 404
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 13, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Goldenhersh
On the bench
Underwood, Goldenhersh, Ryan, Clark, Moran, Simon
Cited by
219 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.3%

“prosecutor could properly urge the imposition of death as a deterrent to murder”

How later courts described this case

  • “prosecutor could properly urge the imposition of death as a deterrent to murder”
  • "the proof of guilt is overwhelming"
  • statutory aggravating factor "no significant history of prior criminal history" is neither vague nor overly broad
  • counsel is not required to file futile motions in order to provide effective representation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH, concurring:

I joined Mr. Justice Ryan in his dissent in People ex rel. Carey v. Cousins (1979), 77 Ill. 2d 531 , and for the reasons therein stated am of the opinion that the death penalty provisions of section 9—1 of the Criminal Code are unconstitutional. Following the decision of People ex rel. Carey v. Cousins I have concurred in several opinions pertaining to the application of certain provisions of section 9—1. (People v. Greer (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 103 ; People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508 ; People v. Carlson (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 564 ; People v. Walker (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 512 .) Because it was held that the death penalty could not be imposed in those cases, there was no reason to explain my concurrence in the court’s opinions.

It is apparent that the General Assembly and a majority of the electorate of this State desire that the death penalty be available as a sanction in certain types of cases. If this court were the final tribunal to determine the validity of the statute in its present form I would continue to dissent in the hope that ultimately a majority of the court would agree or that the General Assembly might be persuaded to effect the amendments which I consider necessary to render the statute valid. In this situation, however, the Supreme Court can grant certiorari and decide the questions on which this court is divided.

Once this court has spoken, I, like any other citizen of Illinois, must acquiesce in its decision. That there be a final decision on the issue is of great importance for the reason that there are now pending before this court 26 cases wherein death penalties have been imposed. It is essential that the question of the validity of the statute be determined. Consequently, with considerable reluctance, under the compulsion of People ex rel. Carey v. Cousins, I concur in the opinion affirming the judgment of the circuit court of Champaign County.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.