Opinion

Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

  • 168 F.3d 1360
  • 335 U.S. App. D.C. 60
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8333
  • 1999 WL 167538
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Mar 22, 1999
Status
Published
On the bench
Edwards, Wald, Silberman, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, Garland
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.9%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ Petition For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion. Their statement is attached.

Separate statement filed by WALD and TATEL, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.