Opinion

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. And Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

  • 969 F.2d 1248
  • 297 U.S. App. D.C. 248
  • 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21496
  • 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1564
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25153
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Oct 9, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Buckley, Williams, Ginsburg, Mikya, Wald, Edwards, Silberman, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph
Cited by
7 cases

under the analogous Exemption 3 to the Gov *1172 ernment in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(3)

How later courts described this case

  • under the analogous Exemption 3 to the Gov *1172 ernment in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(3)
  • under the analogous Exemption 3 to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(3)
  • under the analogous Exemption 3 to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. s 552b(c)(3)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

Oct. 9, 1992.

Petitioner’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full Court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.