Opinion

Lee Martin, of the Estate of Esther S. Martin and Trustee of the Esther S. Martin Living Trust v. The United States of America

  • 833 F.2d 655
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Filed
Jan 11, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Ripple
On the bench
Wood, Cudahy, Ripple
Cited by
41 cases

holding that “[a] timely sufficient claim for refund is a jurisdic- tional prerequisite to a refund suit”

How later courts described this case

  • holding that “[a] timely sufficient claim for refund is a jurisdic- tional prerequisite to a refund suit”
  • noting that knowledge of the claim does not defeat the IRS’ right to require compliance with its regulations
  • "A timely, sufficient claim for refund is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a refund suit."
  • insufficient notice to IRS

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

In my view, the taxpayer’s letter of September 19,1983 was sufficient notice to the Internal Revenue Service that the taxpayer was seeking a refund and of the basis for that claim. The adequacy of this notice is especially clear when one assesses the letter in the context of the overall negotiations between the taxpayer and the government.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.