Opinion

Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General. Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General

  • 737 F.2d 1069
  • 237 U.S. App. D.C. 364
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jun 14, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Davis, Bork, Edwards
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 86.4%

indicating that “the constitutional context, the statutory text, and the legislative history . . . demonstrate that the [EIGA] does not create a cause of action”

How later courts described this case

  • indicating that “the constitutional context, the statutory text, and the legislative history . . . demonstrate that the [EIGA] does not create a cause of action”
  • “[T]he Act establishes no mechanism for considering citizen complaints ... [T]he text contains nothing that even suggests a private cause of action.”
  • “[T]he Ethics in Government Act creates no private right of action to compel the Attorney General to conduct a preliminary investigation.’.’

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

We reverse the District Court’s decision granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.