Opinion

James Lee Spencer v. Walter D. Zant, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center

  • 715 F.2d 1562
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14561
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Dec 13, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Lynne
On the bench
Kravitch, Johnson, Lynne, Godbold, Ron-Ey, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Vance, Henderson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark
Cited by
53 cases

while not addressing a due process challenge to the placement of burden, the court held that “Spencer wholly failed to establish any substantial or bona fide doubt that he was competent to stand trial.”

How later courts described this case

  • while not addressing a due process challenge to the placement of burden, the court held that “Spencer wholly failed to establish any substantial or bona fide doubt that he was competent to stand trial.”
  • noting that as late as May 1982 these studies were available only through oral testimony
  • Underrepresentation of blacks and women on jury lists “appears” to satisfy actual prejudice requirement, where petitioner has alleged blacks and women are less likely to convict a defendant and recommend the death penalty
  • discussing when a state law ground is independent and adequate under Wainwright

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LYNNE, District Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in the judgment of the Court remanding appellant’s challenge to the death penalty statute for further consideration by the district court and in all but part III of the opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.