Opinion

Connie S. ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN & ROOT, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

  • 688 F.2d 410
  • 1983 A.M.C. 2400
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24975
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Oct 7, 1982
Status
Published
On the bench
Gee, Randall, Tate
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.3%

The opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GEE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On rehearing, the panel is no longer unanimous in the conclusion of our earlier opinion, reported at 688 F.2d 410 , that error, if any, was harmless. We remain, however, unanimous in the view that no objection was made to the admission of the evidence complained of on appeal and that plain error is not presented.

Unanimity being required for dispositions on the summary calendar, we withdraw all references to harmless error contained in the opinion, leaving our affirmance to rest on the other, sufficient ground. In all other respects, the rehearing is

DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.