Opinion

United States v. Joseph C. Frady

636 F.2d 506
204 U.S. App. D.C. 234
1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12972

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed: Oct 22, 1980
Status: Published
On the bench: Claims, Edwards, Friedman, MacKINNON, McGOWAN, Mikva, Per Curiam, Robb, Robinson, Tamm, Wald, Wilkey, Wright
Cited by: 9 cases

Reversed by United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152 (1982)

The opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

Before WRIGHT, Chief Judge, McGOWAN, TAMM, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB, WILKEY, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestion for rehearing en bane, filed by appellee having been transmitted to the full Court and a majority of the judges in regular active service not having voted in favor thereof, it is

ORDERED, by the Court, en banc, that appellee’s aforesaid suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.