Opinion

James Arthur Brown v. J. D. Cox, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

  • 481 F.2d 622
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9093
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 28, 1973
Status
Published
Author
Boreman
On the bench
Haynsworth, Boreman, Winter, Craven, Butzner, Russell, Field, Widener
Cited by
18 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.0%

The opinion

BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge

(dissenting):

This appeal was originally considered by a panel consisting of Haynsworth, Chief Judge, Boreman, Senior Circuit Judge, and Russell, Circuit Judge. I was designated to write for the court and, after an extended period of consideration and study, I prepared and submitted an opinion which was accepted and adopted by the panel. Brown v. Cox, 467 F.2d 1255 (4th Cir., 1972).

Subsequently, the court decided to rehear the ease in banc and Judge Russell was designated to write for the court. My colleagues who joined in the original opinion have been persuaded to approve and accept Judge Russell’s opinion on rehearing.

After careful consideration I find myself unpersuaded and in disagreement. In dissenting I simply adhere to my views expressed in the original panel decision, 467 F.2d 1255 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.