Opinion

Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, Chairman

  • 477 F.2d 278
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9745
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
May 25, 1973
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Tuttle, Wisdom, Gewin, Bell, Thornberry, Coleman, Goldberg, Ainsworth, Godbold, Dyer, Simpson, Morgan, Clark, Ingraham, Roney
Cited by
77 cases

Vacated by Scarpa v. United States Board of Parole, 414 U.S. 809 (1973)

Clark & Simpson, JJ., concurring

How later courts described this case

  • Clark & Simpson, JJ., concurring
  • due process does not apply

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RO-NEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge,

with whom WISDOM and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

With deference, I dissent from the denial of the petition for re-hearing for the grounds heretofore stated in my dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.