Opinion

Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis Bishop

  • 476 F.2d 203
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jun 1, 1973
Status
Published
On the bench
Aldrich, Simpson, Clark
Cited by
29 cases

Modified by Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis Bishop, 488 F.2d 310 (1973)

absence of parties who have known of suit since the inception does not affect grant of com- plete relief

How later courts described this case

  • absence of parties who have known of suit since the inception does not affect grant of com- plete relief
  • selective removal of black registrants from voter rolls

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, IN-GRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.