Opinion

Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice

  • 417 F.2d 220
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Oct 21, 1969
Status
Published
On the bench
Lewis, Brown, Thornberry, Morgan
Cited by
42 cases

held that the lack of regulations guiding administrative officers’ discretion, delegated to administer Section 1255, in no way impaired their ability to exercise such discretion nor did it constitute a denial of due process

How later courts described this case

  • held that the lack of regulations guiding administrative officers’ discretion, delegated to administer Section 1255, in no way impaired their ability to exercise such discretion nor did it constitute a denial of due process
  • factual findings upon which denial of discretionary relief is predicated must meet substantial evidence test

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Bane is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.