Opinion

Ernest W. Harried v. United States

  • 389 F.2d 281
  • 128 U.S. App. D.C. 330
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4366
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Nov 30, 1967
Status
Published
Author
Wright
On the bench
Miller, Burger, Wright
Cited by
67 cases

defendant "staked all on the insanity defense”

How later courts described this case

  • defendant "staked all on the insanity defense”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge

(concurring in the result):

I concur in the result. Appellant’s attacks on his retained trial counsel for ineffective assistance, while serious, are not sufficiently supported by the record as made to warrant reversal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.