Opinion

Hercules Powder Company v. The United States

  • 337 F.2d 643
  • 167 Ct. Cl. 639
  • 14 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5783
  • 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 14
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Oct 16, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Laramore
On the bench
Davis, Jones, Whitaker, Laramore, Durfee, Dayis
Cited by
11 cases

all applying collateral estoppel even though different tax years were involved

How later courts described this case

  • all applying collateral estoppel even though different tax years were involved

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LARAMORE, Judge

(concurring in the result):

I concur in the result reached by Judge Whitaker in his opinion, since I believe that, on the merits, this case is controlled by the first Hercules Powder case, supra. I adhere to my original belief that the General Electric case, supra, was erroneously decided.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.