Opinion

James W. Killough v. United States

  • 315 F.2d 241
  • 114 U.S. App. D.C. 305
  • 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3987
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Oct 4, 1962
Status
Published
Author
Bastian
On the bench
Miller, Edgerton, Bazelon, Fahy, Washington, Danaher, Bastian, Burger, Wright
Cited by
56 cases

McNabb v. United States, 318 U. S. 332 (1943); Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 (1957)

How later courts described this case

  • McNabb v. United States, 318 U. S. 332 (1943); Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 (1957)
  • first confession obtained before accused given his preliminary hearing
  • later confession held inadmissible as the “fruit” of an earlier one

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

I agree with the dissenting opinions and only wish to add that, in my opinion, the court today has struck a grievous blow at the administration of criminal justice.

In my opinion, the judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.