Opinion

United States v. Eugene Jones

  • 308 F.2d 26
  • 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4273
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
Aug 17, 1962
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
Moore, Smith, Clark, Waterman, Friendly, Kaufman, Hays, Marshall
Cited by
65 cases

finding no constructive possession

How later courts described this case

  • finding no constructive possession

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SMITH, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent. I would affirm the conviction here. Jones was a facilitator, with knowledge of Big Charlie’s possession, actively promoting the sale by Big Charlie to Brown for Jones’s gain. Jones was so far in partnership in the enterprise that Big Charlie’s possession is Jones’s possession for the application of the presumption of knowledge of illegal importation. See United States v. San-tore, 2 Cir. 1960, 290 F.2d 51 concurring opinion at pp. 82, 83.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.