Opinion

Vinegar Hill Zinc Company, a Corporation v. United States

  • 276 F.2d 13
  • 149 Ct. Cl. 494
  • 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 87
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Apr 6, 1960
Status
Published
Author
Whitaker
On the bench
Madden, Whitaker
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

WHITAKER, Judge

(dissenting).

I cannot agree with the decision of the majority.

Article XIX of the contract does not say that in the event of a condition beyond plaintiff’s control, the time for performance of the contract would be extended. The article merely says that such a condition will excuse performance. The contract completion date was September 30, 1954. The Government is under no obligation to further extend the time or to pay for zinc mined after that date.

The Government made no representation to plaintiff with respect to the zinc content of the ore to be extracted from *17 the mine. The Government made no borings to ascertain the zinc content. The borings were made by plaintiff. Certainly the Government is not in anyway obligated, either legally or equitably, to relieve plaintiff from the consequences of its reliance upon the indications obtained from its own exploration.

I would dismiss the plaintiff’s petition.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.