Opinion

Alice v. Prokop and Harry W. Prokop. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Alice v. Prokop

  • 254 F.2d 544
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Filed
May 29, 1958
Status
Published
Author
Finnegan
On the bench
Finnegan, Schnackenberg, Wham
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.6%

estimating how much of embezzled funds were attributable to taxpayer as income

How later courts described this case

  • estimating how much of embezzled funds were attributable to taxpayer as income

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge

(concurring in the result).

It seems plain that by releasing Mrs. Prokop, the Union waived all its rights and claims in sums exceeding $36,000, leaving this taxpayer well outside the scope of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 1946, 327 U.S. 404 , 66 S.Ct. 546 , 90 L.Ed. 752 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.