The opinion
n- ., T i
, j ^
^ , , , Smce “° ExecputlIe Order, but only a ™em°ran 0 e oya y evie^ Board, undertook to authorize repeated . .... .. , , ,, , investigations oí identical loyalty charg- . , , , . es against a government employee, under ,, . old standards or new ones, the question ... _ .. n ’ ,, , whether an Executive Order could do so 18 not before us- Wholly apart from any ^ble question of res judicata, nothm+g ^s than express language m a stat-ate or Executive Order should be regarded as authOT1^ such repeated mvestigatl°ns’ smce they, ^ely injure the ?mp. °yees conceme > ® oc _ e sense of 3UstlCe and thelsenf °± security of other Persons ^ an ou 0 government, and damage the government by lowering morale and by reducing the appeal of pU]blie service