Opinion

Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Los Angeles

  • 196 F.2d 336
  • 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3819
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 2, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Stephens
On the bench
Stephens, Healy, Bone
Cited by
37 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.6%

"amendments operated in this retroactive manner"

How later courts described this case

  • "amendments operated in this retroactive manner"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge

(concurring).

I agree with Judge BONE’S conclusions as detailed in his exhaustive review of this super-complicated litigation and join in the order contained in the last paragraph of the opinion. The whole subject matter from the beginning presented highly difficult legal questions, solvable in certainty only by the court with the last say. I thoroughly agree that Fahey v. Mallonee, 1947, 332 U.S. 245 , 67 S.Ct. 1552 , 91 L.Ed. 2030 , must be followed as indicated in the main opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.