holding that the controversy involved a labor dispute although the union was insisting on a closed shop and closed shops had previously been outlawed by the Taft-Hartley Act
How later courts described this case
- holding that the controversy involved a labor dispute although the union was insisting on a closed shop and closed shops had previously been outlawed by the Taft-Hartley Act
- holding that union had labor dispute with secondary employer
- “The [LMRA] did not give private litigants the right to obtain injunctive relief even in those situations where a suit for damages was allowed.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BLACK, District Judge.
I concur as to the result.