The opinion
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge,
concurring Specially.
I concur in the result. Although there may have been a lack of privity between Mrs. Sharpley and the State, collateral estoppel is inappropriate in this ease because there is not a sufficient identity of issues between the two actions such that equitable considerations argue against estoppel, as indicated by the district court in its opinion. See Memorandum and Order, document 101, at 20, n. 21.