Opinion

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Inernational

  • 920 F.2d 722
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Dec 20, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Anderson
On the bench
Anderson, Eschbach, Hatchett
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.9%

The opinion

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

Respectfully, I dissent. In my judgment, binding precedent in this circuit requires reversal. In a very similar context, the Former Fifth Circuit held that a newly-hired permanent employee is not displaced by a returning striker “even though subsequently he may be divested of the job for failure to pass medical or security clearance.” National Airlines, Inc. v. International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 430 F.2d 957, 961 (5th Cir.1970). I do not agree with the majority that the conditions of employment in National Airlines — i.e., medical or security clearance— can be dismissed as merely technical. In the airline industry, the medical condition and security clearance of workers is not technical.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.