Opinion

Dynamics Corp. of America v. CTS Corp.

  • 805 F.2d 705
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33228
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Filed
Nov 3, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Cudahy
On the bench
Bauer, Cudahy, Dahy, Posner
Cited by
14 cases

Reversed on other grounds by CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, 481 U.S. 69 (1987)

analyzing defensive and auctioneering tactics wholly as questions of state law

How later courts described this case

  • analyzing defensive and auctioneering tactics wholly as questions of state law

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

Certainly I have no objection to a remand to explore the various matters the majority so ably delineates. In any event, remand will likely have little practical impact on a “poison pill” which expires next April.

I write separately only to note that we are dealing here first and foremost with a district court’s determination of good faith in the context of a preliminary injunction. A finding of good faith can sometimes amount to something greater than the sum of its parts. Hence I would now and ultimately be adequately deferential to the findings of as experienced and knowledgeable a jurist as Judge Getzendanner.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.