Opinion

Byrd v. Heinrich Schmidt Reederei

688 F.2d 324
1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25418

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed: Sep 22, 1982
Status: Published
Author: Hill
On the bench: Also, Anderson, Brown, Clark, Fay, Forth, Gee, Godbold, Hatchett, Henderson, Hill, III, Itz, Johnson, Kravitch, Opinions, Pol, Randall, Reavley, Roney, Rubin, Slater, Tate, Their, Tjoflat, Vance, Williams
Cited by: 5 cases
Authority: More cited than 19.3%

The opinion

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge,

with whom

R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting:

For the reasons set forth in my opinion in Culver v. Slater, 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), issued this date, I dissent from so much of the court’s decision as authorizes a procedure other than that used in Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 382 F.Supp. 1271 (D.Conn.1974), aff’d in relevant part, 524 F.2d 384 (2d Cir. 1975).

For the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in 79-3985, Culver v. Slater, Judges CHARLES CLARK, joined by RONEY, GEE and FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., also dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.