Opinion

Berry v. Cooper

  • 577 F.2d 322
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jul 31, 1978
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Godbold, Goldberg, Morgan, Tuttle
Cited by
18 cases
Authority
More cited than 85.5%

the record in that case established that 65 percent of the undeliverable questionnaires were sent to black persons and 54 percent of the unreturned questionnaires were addressed to black persons

How later courts described this case

  • the record in that case established that 65 percent of the undeliverable questionnaires were sent to black persons and 54 percent of the unreturned questionnaires were addressed to black persons
  • jury lists found to be discriminatory may be required to be revised

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

The panel decision, Meltzer v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, Florida, 5 Cir., 1977, 548 F.2d 559 , rehearing en banc granted, 553 F.2d 1008 , sets out the factual and procedural posture of this lawsuit. The Court en banc considered the following issues: (1) whether the District Court correctly denied relief on the constitutional challenge to the Orange County school board’s resolution requiring daily morning devotionals of Bible reading and prayer in the public schools; 1 (2) whether the District Court correctly denied relief on the constitutional challenge to the Orange County school board’s guidelines for the distribution of religious literature at designated locations on the school premises; 2 (3) whether the District Court’s denial of relief on the constitutional challenge to Fla.Stat. § 231.09(2) (the “Christian virtue” statute which requires teachers to inculcate Christian virtues in their students) presents a case or controversy. 3 The Court en banc adopts the portion of the panel opinion which reverses the District Court on issue (1) and which holds the morning devotional unconstitutional. The Court en banc affirms by an equally divided vote the District Court’s holding on issues (2) and (3). 4

REVERSED IN PART: AFFIRMED IN PART.

. See the panel’s discussion of this issue, 548 F.2d at 572-74 .

. Id. at 572, 574-76 .

. Id. at 572, 576-79 .

. See, e. g., School Board of City of Richmond v. State Board of Education, 1973, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.ct. 1952, 36 L.Ed.2d 771 ; Rice v. Sioux City Cemetery, 1954, 348 U.S. 880 , 75 S.Ct. 122 , 99 L.Ed. 693 , on rehearing, 1955, 349 U.S. 70 , 73, 75 S.Ct. 614 , 99 L.Ed. 897 ; United States v. Holmes, 5 Cir., 1976, 537 F.2d 227 ; Carter v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 325 F.2d 697 , cert. denied, 1964, 377 U.S. 946 , 84 S.Ct. 1353 , 12 L.Ed.2d 308 ; 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 902, pp. 338, 339.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.