Opinion

United States v. Turk

  • 526 F.2d 654
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13093
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 29, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Dyergewin
On the bench
Dyer, Gewin, Goldberg
Cited by
109 cases

finding that "[i]f a person secrets a recorder in a room and thereby records a conversation between two others, an 'acquisition' occurs at the time the recording is made. This acquisition itself might be said to be 'aural' because the contents of the conversation are preserved in a form which permits the later aural disclosure of the contents.”

How later courts described this case

  • finding that "[i]f a person secrets a recorder in a room and thereby records a conversation between two others, an 'acquisition' occurs at the time the recording is made. This acquisition itself might be said to be 'aural' because the contents of the conversation are preserved in a form which permits the later aural disclosure of the contents.”
  • holding that replaying a previously recorded conversation is not an intercept, because an intercept “require[s] participation by the one charged with an ‘interception’ in the contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device.”
  • refusing to assume “that the police could be so confident that an immunized search victim would prevaricate before a grand jury that they would be willing to seize evidence of a crime illegally, and thus to forego the possibility of direct prosecution”
  • replaying previously recorded conversation is not an intercept because an “intercept” as defined prior to the ECPA, “requirefs] participation by the one charged with an ‘interception’ in the contemporaneous acquisition of the communication through the use of the device”

Written by the judges who cited it.

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, Defendants, 816 F.2d 980 (1987)

    Because no similar privacy interest is involved here, Turk is inapposite.
    Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMay 28, 1987Read it

The opinion

DYER, Circuit Judge, with whom GEWIN, Circuit Judge,

joins, specially concurring:

Since I agree that, even if Turk has standing to challenge the search and seizure, the introduction of the seized evidence at the perjury trial was not error, I would pretermit deciding the standing issue.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.