holding that “the vessel must be more than the inert locale of the injury” to give rise to shipowner liability
How later courts described this case
- holding that “the vessel must be more than the inert locale of the injury” to give rise to shipowner liability
- underwriters could not recover against additional assured "in the face of the explicit policy provision waiving subrogation" even though the "additional assured ... cannot claim the affirmative benefit of the [policy] coverage"
- charterer operated a crane which was the sole proximate cause of the injury involved
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.