Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

  • 426 F.2d 729
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Apr 13, 1970
Status
Published
On the bench
Godbold, Morgan, Thornberry
Cited by
19 cases

word “loss” in notice provision of fidelity bond means date of discovery of fraud of bank director

How later courts described this case

  • word “loss” in notice provision of fidelity bond means date of discovery of fraud of bank director
  • "deliberate deception by pretense and stealth constitute(s) dishonest and fraudulent conduct," citing Maryland Casualty Co.
  • “deliberate deception by pretense and stealth constitute^] dishonest and fraudulent conduct,” citing Maryland Casualty Co.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.