Opinion

Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. Pelzer

  • 91 F. 665
  • 34 C.C.A. 45
  • 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1863
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Dec 21, 1898
Status
Published
Author
Butler
On the bench
Acheson, Butler, Kirkpatrick
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.1%

The opinion

BUTLER, District Judge.

I dissent on the ground that the decision in Maitland v. Manufacturing Co. [ 29 C. C. A. 607 ], 86 Fed. 124 , by the circuit court of appeals for the Second circuit, should control our decree. The issue and proofs were substantially the same there as they are here, and the defendant here was associated in the defense there. I cannot regard the effort made in the foregoing opinion-to distinguish the cases as successful. The conclusion to reverse rests mainly on a contention that the decision in Maitland v. Manufacturing Co; is erroneous; and it was upon this contention that the appellant rested his case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.