Opinion

In re Roanoke Furnace Co.

  • 166 F. 944
  • 1909 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 425
Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 23, 1909
Status
Published
Author
McPherson
On the bench
McPherson
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.2%

The opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

1. The motion of T. E- Wood-ruff, claimant, filed on December 28, 1908, praying the court to dismiss the trustee’s petition (which does not seem to have been presented until December 30th), in which a special order granting a petition for review of the referee’s decision is asked for nunc pro tunc, is hereby refused.

2. In my opinion, the referee did not make a final order, allowing the claim of T. E. Woodruff as a lien creditor entitled to priority of payment, until September 2, 1908. Upon consideration of the trustee’s motion for leave to file a petition to review that order, and the claim *945 ant’s answer thereto, it is ordered that the trustee have leave to file now in the District Court the petition for review that has already been presented to the referee, with the same effect as if it had been filed with him within 10 days from September 2, 1908.

As the referee’s record has in fact been duly certified to the court, and a full argument has been had upon the questions raised by his decision, no further action by the referee is necessary.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.