Opinion

Thayer-West Point Hotel Co. v. United States

64 F. Supp. 565
106 Ct. Cl. 60
1946 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 29

Court: United States Court of Claims
Filed: Mar 4, 1946
Status: Published
Author: Whitaker
On the bench: Jones, Littleton, Madden, Took, Whaley, Whitaker
Cited by: 6 cases

Distinguished

Distinguished by Fordyce v. United States, 7 Cl. Ct. 591 (1985)
The cases on which plaintiffs rely, Pete v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 270, 531 F.2d 1018 (1976), and Thayer-West Point Hotel Co. v. United States, 106 Ct.Cl. 60, 64 F.Supp. 565 (1946), are inapposite to the present case.7 Pete involved compensation for three custom made cabin barges located in a newly created wilderness area.
United States Court of ClaimsMar 12, 1985Read it

The opinion

Whitaker, Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent. I think $500,000.00 would be liberal compensation.

Madden, Judge, took no part in the decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.