Opinion

Daigle v. United States

  • 42 Ct. Cl. 124
  • 1907 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 88
  • 1907 WL 916
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Feb 4, 1907
Status
Published
Author
Ilowry
On the bench
Ilowry, Peelle
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

IlowRY J.,

concurring:

I concur in the conclusion. Where in a claim for stores and supplies by a reference under the Tucker Act the claimant offers no proof of loyalty, a simple finding .to that effect should be made, thereby remitting to Congress, in the exercise of its wisdom, the matter of an appropriation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.