Opinion

Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

  • 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 113
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 18, 1958
Status
Published
Author
Weygandt
On the bench
Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Stewart, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Weygandt, C. J.,

dissenting. It is important to note the source of this controversy. .

The sole reason the township zoning inspector refused the appellant’s application for a zoning certificate was “Buildings not shown on exhibit A. No plot plan for building with application.’’

Although the issuance of building permits is not within the jurisdiction of the zoning inspector, it hardly seems beyond the bounds of reasonableness to require the appellant to furnish the zoning authorities some indication of the number, size, nature and purpose of the buildings tó be constructed on the tract of land if the application were granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.