Opinion

State v. Anderson

  • 144 Tenn. 564
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 15, 1921
Status
Published
Author
Bachman
On the bench
Bachman, Carroll, Hall, Nxjnn, Reab, Smith
Cited by
12 cases

The opinion

BachmaN, J.

(dissenting).

I am of the opinion that chapter 61 of the Public Acts of 1919 is unconstitutional, for the reason that it authorizes the appropriation of the public funds to private uses and purposes, and, in so far as the dissenting opinion of Mr. Special Justice Smith is based upon this ground, I concur therein.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.