Opinion
The opinion
McFARLAND, J.,
said:
I concur in the conclusion that this case is not within the statute of frauds. I entertain some doubt as to whether this plaintiff can maintain an action at law for want of privity of contract with the defendant, but it may be that this distinction between a *545 remedy at law or in equity ought not to be longer maintained.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.