stating, in considering whether summary'judgment was improperly granted after excluding certain expert evidence, “[w]e review a district court’s evidentiary rulings ... for an abuse of discretion”
How later courts described this case
- stating, in considering whether summary'judgment was improperly granted after excluding certain expert evidence, “[w]e review a district court’s evidentiary rulings ... for an abuse of discretion”
- stating that "[i]t is only when the proponent offers 'novel' 'scientific' evidence that the" general acceptance standard applies
- stating that we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted
- stating that foundational reliability analysis under Rule 702 and Frye–Mack is nearly identical
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
MEYER, Justice
(dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice Paul H. Anderson.