Opinion

Berkley Machine Co. v. United States

  • 55 Cust. Ct. 444
  • 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1642
Court
United States Customs Court
Filed
Oct 5, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Rao
On the bench
Ford, Rao
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

Concurring Opinion

Rao, Chief Judge:

For the reason that I am of opinion that the record in the instant ease is insufficient to establish the degree and extent of the structural changes which must be made to the machine in issue in order to convert it to function with nonelectrical motive power, I concur in the conclusion reached by my esteemed colleague in this ease.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.