Opinion

J. Goldenberg Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States

  • 36 Cust. Ct. 172
Court
United States Customs Court
Filed
Apr 4, 1956
Status
Published
Author
Ekwall
On the bench
Donlon, Ekwall, Johnson
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION

EKwall, Judge:

I agree with my colleagues that the motion of Government counsel to dismiss the protests should be denied, for the reason that I construe the protests as a claim against the legality of the liquidations and, as such, subject to protest under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. I express no opinion on the merits of the controversy, that question, as I see it, not being before the court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.