Opinion

Nuclear Information Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

969 F.2d 1169
297 U.S. App. D.C. 169

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed: Jul 17, 1992
Status: Published
Author: Buckley
On the bench: Buckley, Edwards, Ginsburg, Henderson, Mikva, Randolph, Sentelle, Silberman, Wald, Williams
Cited by: 4 cases

The opinion

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I am in substantial agreement with the majority on all but its essential conclusion. As I find that neither the potential post-construction hearing on conformity with the license’s acceptance criteria nor the section 2.206 proceeding is a permissible substitute for the pre-operational hearing mandated by section 189(a)(1) when read in conjunction with section 185, I must dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.