Opinion

Ivy v. Republican Party

  • 318 Ark. 50
  • 883 S.W.2d 805
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 497
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Sep 23, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Newbern
On the bench
Brown, Corbin, Newbern
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.5%

political party chairman and secretary do not have the authority to declare a party nominee ineligible and thereby create a "vacancy in nomination."

How later courts described this case

  • political party chairman and secretary do not have the authority to declare a party nominee ineligible and thereby create a "vacancy in nomination."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

David Newbern, Justice, dissenting. Mr. Ivy’s petition for mandamus, injunction, and declaratory relief was filed with this Court yesterday, September 22, 1994. Late yesterday afternoon a response was filed. This morning, September 23, 1994, we heard oral arguments on the issues presented in those pleadings. The issues are significant. This afternoon this Court issued its decision.

The definiteness and quality of the opinions issued may belie my position, but I cannot believe we have acted so rapidly. The pleadings deserved to be given very serious consideration. Sometimes we have the good judgment not to agree to hear matters in which the parties seek an expeditious result which requires us to go too fast. See, e.g., Westark Christian Action Council v. Stodola, 311 Ark. 449 , 843 S.W.2d 318 (1993).

While I express no opinion on the merits of the petition or response, I must respectfully dissent from the action of the Court which I regard as precipitous.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.