Opinion

Calico Rock School District 50 v. Speak

  • 293 Ark. 206
  • 736 S.W.2d 10
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2302
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Sep 28, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Hays
On the bench
Glaze, Hays, Hickman, Purtle
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

Steele Hays, Justice, dissenting. I believe the majority, like

the trial court, is influenced by the fact that the school district managed to avoid a deficit and finish the school year in the black. That seems to me to be beside the point.

It is clear from the letter and spirit of the statutes dealing with school financing that the legislature meant to delegate the power to school districts to take extraordinary, and timely, measures to avoid operating at a loss. The actions of the superintendent were, I think, entirely consistent with those sound objectives and the district ought not to be penalized for accomplishing what the legislature so clearly mandated. I would reverse.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.