Opinion

B.J.G. v. F.W.J.

  • 961 So. 2d 855
  • 2007 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 25
  • 2007 WL 80494
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jan 12, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Crawley
On the bench
Thompson, Murdock, Bryan, Pittman, Crawley
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.1%

The opinion

CRAWLEY, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

Our standard of review requires us to give deference to the juvenile court in a case such as this. Ex parte R.E.C., 899 So.2d 272, 279 (Ala.2004). The juvenile court heard the testimony presented in each hearing and, more importantly, ob *865 served the demeanor of each witness, including the parents. Id. The juvenile court, not this court, is given the task of judging the credibility of each witness, of weighing the evidence, and of determining the best interest of the child based on that evidence. Id. The appellate court’s role is not to reweigh the evidence or to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Id. Because I believe that this court has done so in the present case, I must respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.