Opinion

T.D.P. v. D.D.P.

  • 950 So. 2d 311
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Aug 4, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Pittman, Thompson, Bryan, Crawley, Murdock
Cited by
18 cases

The opinion

MURDOCK, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I concur in the result. I write separately for the purpose of noting that on remand, the juvenile court, if it has not *317 already done so while this case has been on appeal, must determine as a threshold matter whether the state of dependency that it found to exist in its October 21, 2005, judgment continues to exist. Based on the evidence presented at the last hearing conducted by the juvenile court, it certainly is foreseeable that the children no longer are dependent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.