Opinion

Childers v. State

  • 931 So. 2d 86
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17207
  • 2006 WL 237081
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Feb 2, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Webster
On the bench
Allen, Benton, Browning, Davis, Ervin, Hawkes, Kahn, Lewis, Nortwick, Padovano, Polston, Thomas, Webster, Wolf
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

WEBSTER, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with those of my colleagues who argue that this case does not present a question of “great public importance” so as to justify en banc consideration and, therefore, dissent from the majority opinion to that extent. On the merits of the issues decided, however, I concur fully with the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.