Opinion

Greene v. Byrd

  • 897 So. 2d 1107
  • 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 764
  • 2003 WL 22319463
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Oct 10, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Crawley
On the bench
Yates, Crawley, Thompson, Pittman, Murdock
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.0%

treating the revocation of a community-corrections sentence as a probation revocation

How later courts described this case

  • treating the revocation of a community-corrections sentence as a probation revocation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CRAWLEY, Judge,

concurring in part and concurring in the result in part.

I concur in affirming the trial court’s denial of Officer Greene’s motions for a judgment as a matter of law and in distinguishing this case from Montgomery v. City of Montgomery, 732 So.2d 305 (Ala.Civ.App.1999). However, although I agree that the ratio of compensatory damages to punitive damages is not excessive, I believe that the comparison must be made between the amount .of compensatory damages and the amóirní ¡$f punitive damages awarded by the jury, not between the compensatory-damages award and the punitive-damages award after either award has been reduced by the amount of the pro *1118 tanto settlement. See Reliable Mech., Inc. v. Integrated Constr. Servs., Inc., 781 So.2d 207, 208 (Ala.2000) (See, J., dissenting from the denial of rehearing).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.