"Hudson's activities are comparable to the activities referred to in Cranman as a state agent's `exercising his or her judgment... [in] ... allocating resources [or] negotiating contracts.'"
How later courts described this case
- "Hudson's activities are comparable to the activities referred to in Cranman as a state agent's `exercising his or her judgment... [in] ... allocating resources [or] negotiating contracts.'"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BROWN, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority’s opinion denying the petition. I believe that the defendant, Russell Hudson, has demonstrated that he is entitled to State-agent immunity as to all of the claims and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a summary judgment. I would therefore grant the petition for the writ of mandamus as to all claims asserted by Duane Haston.
STUART, J., concurs.